research paper on mobile addiction

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock Locked padlock icon ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

• Publications
• Account settings
• Advanced Search
• Journal List

Problematic Mobile Phone Use and Addiction Across Generations: the Roles of Psychopathological Symptoms and Smartphone Use

Daria j kuss, eiman kanjo, mark crook-rumsey, fraenze kibowski, grace y wang, alex sumich.

• Author information
• Article notes
• Copyright and License information

Corresponding author.

Issue date 2018.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Contemporary technological advances have led to a significant increase in using mobile technologies. Recent research has pointed to potential problems as a consequence of mobile overuse, including addiction, financial problems, dangerous use (i.e. whilst driving) and prohibited use (i.e. use in forbidden areas). The aim of this study is to extend previous findings regarding the predictive power of psychopathological symptoms (depression, anxiety and stress), mobile phone use (i.e. calls, SMS, time spent on the phone, as well as the engagement in specific smartphone activities) across Generations X and Y on problematic mobile phone use in a sample of 273 adults. Findings revealed prohibited use and dependence were predicted by calls/day, time on the phone and using social media. Only for dependent mobile phone use (rather than prohibited), stress appeared as significant. Using social media and anxiety significantly predicted belonging to Generation Y, with calls per day predicted belonging to Generation X. This finding suggests Generation Y are more likely to use asynchronous social media-based communication, whereas Generation X engage more in synchronous communication. The findings have implications for prevention and awareness-raising efforts of possibly problematic mobile phone use for educators, parents and individuals, particularly including dependence and prohibited use.

Keywords: Problematic mobile phone use, Smartphone addiction, Psychopathology, Stress, Depression, Anxiety, Generation X, Generation Y

Introduction

Recent technological advances have led to a significant increase in using mobile technologies. The communications regulator Ofcom ( 2016 ) refers to the UK as “smartphone society”: 93% of the population own a smartphone, and users spend more time online on their phone (approximately 20 h/week) than using other devices (e.g. laptops and desktop-computers). These recent trends suggest mobiles and the Internet have become intimately intertwined to enable “on-the-go” access to several facilities (i.e. web-browsing, communication, shopping, banking and gaming) (Ofcom 2016 ).

With the ubiquity and convenience of using mobiles for Internet access, recent research suggests that problematic mobile phone use may consist of several factors, including addiction/dependence (Billieux et al. 2008 ; Chóliz 2010 ), financial problems (Billieux et al. 2008 ), dangerous use (i.e. whilst driving) (Bianchi and Phillips 2005 ; White et al. 2004 ) and prohibited use (i.e. in forbidden areas) (Nickerson et al. 2008 ). From an epidemiological perspective, prevalence rate estimates vary considerably, and there is limited knowledge and understanding about the aetiology of problematic and addictive smartphone use, including its course (Billieux et al. 2015 ). Nonetheless, the World Health Organization ( 2015 ) considers addictive mobile phone use as public health concern, emphasising the need for more research concerning risk factors and course specifiers.

Using mobile Internet may increase habitual checking behaviours, which may contribute to developing psychopathological symptoms, such as addiction symptoms (Jeong et al 2016 ). The recent addition of a behavioural addiction category in the most recent edition of the diagnostic manual (DSM-5) (American Psychiatric Association 2013 ) including Gambling Disorder as first official diagnosis in that category and Internet Gaming Disorder as condition requiring further research to be included in the main manual (Kuss et al. 2016 ) suggests other potential behavioural addictions, e.g. mobile phone addiction, may be included in the manual if they lead to clinically significant impairment. Accordingly, using a biopsychosocial model of addiction, mobile phone or smartphone dependence may be considered to fall within the spectrum of behavioural addictions, including symptoms such as salience, mood modification, withdrawal, tolerance, conflict and relapse (Griffiths 2005 ), if it poses a significant (mental) health concern for the affected individual. Young individuals specifically appear as enthusiastic adopters of mobile technologies, and research suggests teenagers and young adults are considered particularly at risk for developing mobile phone addiction (Jeong et al. 2016 ; Kwon et al. 2013 ).

Generation X (born until the early 1980s) and Generation Y (younger individuals, born in the mid-80s and later) have been found to differ in terms of their adoption of smartphone technology (Gafni and Geri 2013 ), and research suggests that younger individuals may be more likely to develop problems as a consequence of their excessive use of new technologies (Echeburua and de Corral 2010 ). Research using Swiss vocational school students furthermore suggests that smartphone addiction is more prevalent in younger adolescents in comparison to adults (Haug et al. 2015 ), indicating that younger individuals may be particularly at risk for developing problematic mobile phone use. From a developmental perspective, psychosocial maturation may contribute to developing more resilience to stressors in the process of maturation (Motti-Stefanidi 2015 ). As individuals grow older, this may decrease the risk for psychopathological symptom experience and possibly associated maladaptive coping in the form of increased mobile phone use. Consequently, it can be hypothesised that both problematic mobile phone use and psychopathological symptoms experience will be more pronounced in younger age groups, i.e. Generation Y, in comparison to Generation X.

Previous research (Ha et al. 2008 ; Hong et al. 2012 ; Panova and Lleras 2016 ) found excessive use of mobile phones was related to anxiety, depression and general distress. Research has suggested individuals with social anxiety symptoms prefer using mobile phones for text-based asynchronous communication as this may alleviate fears associated with face-to-face and synchronous interactions (Park et al. 2010 ; Reid and Reid 2007 ), potentially contributing to problematic use. It has also been suggested the preference for text-based asynchronous communication (which is often favoured by Generation Y) may exacerbate anxious social behaviours, as physical cues vital for social interaction are not present during these interactions, and the possibilities of developing social confidence and skills are consequently limited (Panova and Lleras 2016 ).

Depression was also linked to dependent mobile phone use in another study using young university students in Iran (Babadi-Akashe et al. 2014 ). Individuals who feel depressed may use mobile phones to seek social support and cope with their loneliness and apathy feelings, which may exacerbate feelings of depression and stress (Murdock 2013 ). Further research (Jeong et al. 2016 ) also highlighted that stress predicts smartphone addiction. As enthusiastic adopters of new technology, Generation Y may use their smartphones to cope with everyday stressors (e.g. social situations and relationship problems), and using the phone as coping mechanism can be considered dysfunctional, similar to using the Internet to cope with life problems (Kuss et al. 2017 ), potentially leading to symptoms traditionally associated with substance-related addictions (Kuss et al. 2014 ).

Previous research on excessive Internet use with young individuals, i.e. both adolescent (Haug et al. 2015 ; Kuss et al. 2013b ) and university student samples (Kuss et al. 2013a ), has indicated technology use is not necessarily problematic per se; however, the use of particular online applications, e.g. gaming (Kuss 2013 ) and social networking (Haug et al. 2015 ; Kuss and Griffiths 2017 ), may put young individuals at risk for developing addiction-related problems (Jeong et al. 2016 ). Similar findings have been produced by a recent cross-cultural study (Lopez-Fernandez et al. 2017 ) involving Generation Y participants from ten European countries, suggesting gaming and social networking may put individuals at risk for developing addiction-related problems through excessive mobile phone use. Another study using elementary school children in South Korea (Jeong et al. 2016 ) found although both social networking and gaming on smartphones may increase the risk of smartphone addiction, using social networking sites was a stronger predictor than gaming.

Moreover, research (Lopez-Fernandez et al. 2017 ) using young individuals highlighted further potential risk factors for mobile phone addiction, namely female gender and time spent using mobile phones. In general, females appear to place stronger emphasis on social interactions than males which may make them more prone to developing problems due to increased mobile phone use. Similarly, time spent using mobile phones and engaging in mobile phone-related activities (e.g. sending text messages and making calls) may contribute to habitualisation effects, including frequent checking (Kanjo et al. 2017 ), which may increase the consequential experience of addiction-related problems.

The aim of this study is to replicate and add to previous findings and fill the gaps in knowledge regarding indicators and predictors of problematic mobile phone use. Based on previous research, it is hypothesised female gender, depression, anxiety, stress and specific mobile phone usage (i.e. time spent, texts sent, calls made, using social networking and gaming, respectively) significantly predict problematic mobile phone use, with these effects mediated by age group (i.e. Generation X vs Generation Y), so they are more pronounced in Generation Y. This study specifically aims to differentiate between different types of problematic mobile phone use, namely dependent, dangerous/prohibited use and financial problems through mobile phone use, as these have been pointed out as viable constructs in previous research (Billieux et al. 2008 ; Nickerson et al. 2008 ; White et al. 2004 ).

Participants

Participants ( N  = 273; aged 16–65 years [ M  = 28.31, SD  = 11.1; 74% females]) from 14 different countries (74.36% UK, 18.32% New Zealand) were recruited through Internet advertising on Android-phone forums and university participant-recruitment pools. A binary age variable was created for comparison between Generation X (31–65 years, 59 women and 24 men, coded as 1) and Generation Y (16–30 years, 143 women and 45 men, coded as 0). There were no significant sex differences between the generations (chi-square = 0.752 (1), p  = 0.45).

Problematic Mobile Phone Use

The 30-item Problematic Mobile Phone Use questionnaire (PMPU) (Billieux et al. 2008 ) uses 4-point Likert-type scales which measure four distinct domains dimensionally, with higher scores indicating more problematic use: (i) dangerous use, defined as using a mobile phone in dangerous situations (e.g. whilst driving, 5 items); (ii) prohibited use, i.e. using mobile phones if forbidden to do so (e.g. in the library, 5 items); (iii) dependence, i.e. presence of addictive symptoms (e.g. feelings of loss without the phone, 7 items) and (iv) financial problems, i.e. monetary problems as direct result of phone use (e.g. receiving high mobile phone bills, 13 items). A 4-factor solution showed good fit to the data in confirmatory factor analyses (Billieux et al. 2008 ), and the PMPU’s external and internal validity have been validated (Billieux 2012 ). Cronbach’s alphas have demonstrated excellent levels of reliability for the dependence ( α  = .85) and financial problems ( α  = .89) subscales and acceptable levels for the prohibited use ( α  = .67) and dangerous use subscales ( α  = .74) (Billieux et al. 2008 ).

Depression, Anxiety and Stress

The 42-item DASS-42 was used to measure depression, anxiety and stress (14 items each) by means of 4-point Likert-scales (Crawford and Henry 2003 ). The depression subscale measures hopelessness, devaluation of life, dysphoria, self-depreciation, lack of interest or involvement, inertia and anhedonia. The anxiety subscale assesses anxious effects, situational anxiety, subjective experience, autonomic arousal and skeletal muscle effects. The stress scale measures overreaction, impatience, difficulty relaxing, nervous arousal and being upset easily. High levels of convergent validity have been demonstrated with the depression subscale of the Personal Disturbance Scale (.78) (Bedford and Foulds 1978 ) and the DASS depression subscale correlated with the depression scale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (.66) (Zigmond and Snaith 1983 ). Excellent levels of reliability have been demonstrated for the depression, anxiety and stress scales ( α  = .91, .84 and .90), respectively (Lovibond and Lovibond 1995 ).

Phone use was measured by inquiring about calls, SMS, time spent on the phone, as well as the engagement in specific smartphone activities. Accordingly, participants were asked the following questions regarding their phone use:

“How many calls do you make with your mobile phone per day?” was assessed using multiple choice answers: “0–2”, “3–5” or “More than 5”. “How many SMS (text messages) do you send per day?” was assessed using multiple choice answers: “0–3”, “4–10” or “More than 10”. “How much time do you spend on your mobile phone per day?” was answered as follows: “0–10 min”, “10–30 min” or “More than 30 min”. “On average, how many times per day do you use your phone for Internet browsing, social media, and games?” was ranked on a 7-point Likert-scale.

Statistical Analyses

The analyses were based on previously used mediator models (Sitko et al. 2014 ). The models were specified using Mplus version 8 (Muthén and Muthén 2011 ) and estimated using the maximum likelihood estimator for the first part and weighted least squares estimation for the second part (due to the binary mediator). For all analyses, STDYX standardised estimates are being reported.

The first part of the two-part analysis estimated the direct effects (c-paths) between the predictor variables (sex, depression, stress, anxiety, calls/day, time on phone, texts/day, ranked phone use for Internet browsing, social media and games) and outcome variables (PMPU subscales) without the mediator. The second part introduced the binary mediating variable age (see Fig.  1 ). The model now included the direct effects between the predictor variables and the mediator (a-paths), the direct effects between the mediator and the outcome variables (b-paths), and the direct effects between predictor and outcome variables, while controlling for the mediator (c’-paths). The meditated effects are the products of the a - and b-paths. There are two contexts for the term mediating effect. One, a previously significant c-path becomes non-significant with the inclusion of the mediator ( c ’ = 0), and the mediating effect is significant, suggesting the relationship between the predictor and outcome variable is fully mediated by age. Two, both the c- and c’-paths are significant with at least one significant mediating effect, suggesting a partial mediation. When a previously non-significant c -path remains non-significant ( c ’ = 0), but the mediating variable is significantly related to at least one predictor and one outcome variable, the term indirect effect is used, indicating any relationship between predictor and outcome is entirely contingent on the mediator.

The mediator model

Mean scores for the DASS42 were 9.16 for depression ( SD  = 8.74, range 0–41), 6.87 for anxiety ( SD  = 6.69, 0–31) and 13.29 for stress ( SD  = 9.32, 0–37); for the PMPU subscales: 9.69 for dangerous ( SD  = 2.08, 8–17), 9.71 for prohibited ( SD  = 3.06, 5–19), 18.56 for dependence ( SD  = 5.47, 7–28) and 23.11 for financial ( SD  = 5.63, 13–46). All scales, apart from the DASS42 depression and anxiety subscales and the PMPU financial subscale, satisfied measures of skew and kurtosis. All scales displayed good Cronbach’s alpha levels above 0.70, other than the PMPU Prohibited (0.63 adequate) and dangerous subscales (0.422 poor). Descriptive statistics and Cronbach’s alpha values are displayed in Table 1 . Due to its low alpha score, the dangerous subscale was not included in the analysis. There was no multi-collinearity present in the predictor variables. The highest correlation was observed between the stress and anxiety subscale at 0.78 ( p  < 0.001).

Descriptive statistics and Cronbach’s alpha values

Regarding the additional phone use questions, 71.4% participants reported making 0–2 calls per day, 22% reported 3–5 calls per day and 6.2% making more than 5 calls per day; the remaining 0.4% of data were missing. Texts per day were more evenly distributed with 34.9% reporting 0–3 texts per day, 30.7% reported 4–10 and 33.2% reported more than 10 per day, with 1.4% missing data. Of the participants, 4% reported 0–10 min in terms of time on phone per day, 7.7% reported 10–30 min and 86.9% reported more than 30 min per day, with 1.5% missing data. The mean for ranking Internet browsing was 5.15 ( SD  = 1.75), social media 5.37 ( SD  = 1.81) and games 2.62 ( SD  = 1.90) with skew and kurtosis within acceptable limits (+/−2). Moreover, calls per day seemed to have a flooring effect, suggesting most people tended to use their phones for fewer calls, whilst time on the phone was found to have a ceiling effect, which suggests that people spent more than 30 min on their phones per day on average. Due to missing data on categorical predictor variables, 18 participants were excluded from the analyses ( N  = 255).

Direct Effects

For part one of the analysis ( N  = 255, ML estimator), the direct effects (c-paths) for prohibited and dependence were similar, with significant paths for calls per day, time on phone and social media. In addition, stress showed a significant, positive relationship with dependence only. For finance, only social media displayed a significant, positive relationship. All c-paths are reported in Table 2 . For the second part of the analyses ( N  = 231, WLSM estimator), the significant direct effects (a-paths) of the predictors on the binary age variable anxiety and social media showed a negative relationship. Calls per day displayed a positive relationship with age; results are reported in Table 3 . Regarding the direct effects (b-path) of age on the PMPUQ subscales, only prohibited use showed a negative relationship with age, reported in Table 4 .

Results of direct effects (c-paths) between predictors and outcome variables

B standardized b coefficients, SE standard error

* p  < 0.05; ** p  < 0.01; *** p  < 0.001

Results of direct effects (a-paths) between predictors and mediator

Results of direct effects (b-paths) between mediator and outcome variables

Comparable to the c-paths, similar trends in significant predictors were seen for the c’-paths for dependence, with stress, calls per day, time on phone and social media remaining significantly and directly related to dependence when age was controlled for and included as a mediator (c’-path Table 5 ). For finance, the significant c-path of the first part of the analysis (Table 2 ) is no longer significant once age was controlled for and included as a mediator (c’-path Table 5 ). For prohibited use, the direct relationship of time on the phone (c-path) remained significant once age was controlled for (c’-path Table 5 ).

Results of direct effects (c’-paths) between predictors and outcome variable including the binary mediator age

Result in italics p  = 0.05

Mediating and Indirect Effects (c’, See Table 5 )

When the effect of the mediator was included in the model, age partially mediated the relationship between calls per day and using social media and prohibited phone use. Calling often in a day related directly to a higher score on prohibited use, but it also made it more likely to belong to the older age category (Generation X) compared to the younger one (Generation Y), which in turn was related to a lower score on prohibited use. Therefore, while calling often directly increased the outcome variable prohibited use, there was a simultaneous muting of that effect through the mediator age. This gives a more detailed and differentiated view on the findings of part one of the analyses, in which calling often per day was related to a higher score in prohibited use (c-path). Ranking social media highly was related directly to higher scores on prohibited use, but also to belonging to the younger age category (Generation Y) compared to the older one (Generation X), which in turn also related to a higher prohibited use score.

There was an indirect relationship between anxiety and prohibited use via the mediator age. While anxiety had no direct relationship to prohibited use in part one of the analysis (c-path) and no direct relationship to prohibited use in part two (c’-path), it was related to belonging to the younger age category (Generation Y) compared to the older (Generation X), which in turn related to higher prohibited use. The total proportion of variance that was significantly explained in the mediator age was 29.0% ( p  < 0.001), for prohibited use, it was 20.9% ( p  < 0.001), dependence 21.6% ( p  < 0.001) and finance 8.5% ( p  = 0.036).

This research aimed to assess the strength of age as mediator between mobile phone use, psychopathological symptoms and gender on problematic mobile phone use and mobile phone addiction. Prohibited use and dependence had similar predictors regarding mobile phone use and activities, namely calls/day, time on the phone and using social media, suggesting there might be a considerable overlap between dependence and prohibited mobile phone use, i.e. when one is addressed, so might the other. Moreover, these phone use variables had both direct and indirect effects on prohibited use and dependence, suggesting the more an individual uses their phone for calls, texts and social media (i.e. for communication), the more prohibited and dependent their use can be. Importantly, the participants’ age was not responsible for time spent on the phone, calls made and social media, indicating risk for dependence and prohibited use could exist at any age. Older individuals in Generation X appear at risk for prohibited use and dependence, however not as much as younger individuals. This is contrary to previous literature (Jeong et al. 2016 ; Kwon et al. 2013 ) suggesting younger individuals (Generation Y) are more at risk for mobile phone use-related problems and addiction. For Generation X, the number of calls made predicts problematic and dependent use, whereas for Generation Y, this is predicted by time on the phone and social media use, suggesting although different age groups appear at risk for problematic mobile phone use, they engage in different usage patterns. Calling often in a day related directly to a higher prohibited use particularly for Generation X, suggesting there are different norms of behaviour associated with phone use in prohibited places for Generation Y and Generation X. These different behaviours may lead to problems, and therefore, communication styles may be important indicators of possibly problematic use differentiating between Generations X and Y. This suggests prevention efforts for problematic mobile phone use are needed for different age groups, but may be particularly beneficial for young populations where potentially problematic behaviours have not yet manifested. It is recommended to use qualitative research to assess the communication style differences between older and younger generations (i.e. synchronous vs asynchronous communication) to outline benefits and disadvantages of different forms of technology-mediated interaction and online/mobile community building and maintenance, particularly regarding differential effects on problematic mobile phone use.

Moreover, only for dependent (rather than prohibited) mobile phone use, stress appeared as significant predictor for both Generations X and Y, indicating stress may differentially impact upon problems experienced through mobile phone use. Some individuals may use their mobiles to cope with everyday stress, similar to individuals using the Internet to cope with and compensate for problems, potentially leading to addiction-related symptoms (Kardefelt-Winther 2014 ; Kuss et al. 2017 ). Accordingly, in the case of dependent use, mobile phone use can be considered a dysfunctional coping method which may offer a short-term solution to stressful experiences, but has potential damaging long-term effects. In the context of prevention and treatment efforts, focusing on developing functional coping mechanisms may reduce the reliance on dysfunctional mobile phone use-related coping.

Contrary to predictions, depression and anxiety were not found to be important predictors of problematic mobile phone use. The only significant effect found was an indirect effect of anxiety on age group, suggesting Generation Y may be more anxious than Generation X, possibly due to Generation Y being more likely to experience a fear of missing out (FOMO) (Przybylski et al. 2013 ), leading to increased pressure to use mobile phones and social media. From a developmental perspective, it appears that whilst in the process of psychosocial maturation, younger individuals may be confronted with more anxiety, which eventually evens out as they become older and more mature (Motti-Stefanidi 2015 ). Similar trends may hold true for depression-related symptoms, but unlike previous research (Babadi-Akashe et al. 2014 ; Murdock 2013 ), this study has not found depression related to problematic mobile phone use. In line with the diagnostic criteria for depression (American Psychiatric Association 2013 ), one could theorise that if individuals are feeling depressed, they may be more likely to withdraw from others, potentially reducing mobile phone use. It is suggested that future research assesses the interaction effects between specific mobile phone uses and both depressive and anxiety symptoms, as there may be inverse relationships with communicative phone use.

Financial problems through mobile phone use were predicted by social media use only; however, this effect disappeared when including the respective generations. An explanation for this finding is that intention of social media use may be different between Generation X and Generation Y; Generation Y use social media mainly for entertainment and networking at minimum cost, while Generation X use social media for marketing and customer management, considered more costly. Therefore, social media use-related financial problems are more likely to be observed in Generation X.

Regarding the mediating effects of age group, using social media and anxiety significantly predicted belonging to Generation Y, with calls per day predicted belonging to Generation X. This finding suggests Generation Y are more likely to use asynchronous communication inherent in popular social media, whereas Generation X engage more in synchronous communication. The results are important particularly given previous media and communication research. Boyd ( 2014 ) stressed the importance of online communication and building online spaces for US teenagers as social media has become an integral element of youth culture, offering alternative spaces for expression and connection. Turkle ( 2013 ) found young individuals appear particularly keen to connect with each other using technology, whilst simultaneously being alone in their physical environments, effectively leading to them being “alone together”. From a psychological perspective, Generation Y’s reliance on asynchronous social media-based communication may lead to a decrease in fear associated with participating in “real life” social interactions, but may increase the likelihood of problems if used to excess (Park et al. 2010 ).

Unlike previous research (Lopez-Fernandez et al. 2017 ), no direct or indirect effects of mobile phone use on associated problems based on participants’ gender were found, suggesting the females in the present sample do not experience more problems through mobile phone use relative to males. It could be speculated that specifically tapping into direct social interactions engaged in via mobile phones (rather than entertainment-focused activities) may yield a more pronounced effect on problems experienced as suggested by previous research and therefore, it is recommended to replicate this research by focusing on assessing interaction effects between female gender and specific social activities engaged in on phones as predictive of problematic mobile phone use.

Moreover, contrary to the outlined hypotheses and previous research (Lopez-Fernandez et al. 2017 ), the engagement in activities other than social media use, namely gaming and browsing, did not significantly predict problematic mobile phone use. It can be hypothesised that this may have resulted from a majority of female participants in this study, and previous research has shown the number of female gamers is still relatively low relative to males (Kuss and Griffiths 2012 ), and females are significantly less likely to present with gaming-related problems in psychotherapy contexts (Kuss and Griffiths 2015 ). Future research should investigate gender differences in mobile phone use habits and possible resulting problems using longitudinal and qualitative studies.

Limitations include the cross-sectional nature of this research, which does not provide indications of causality, the recruiting of a self-selected sample and the use of self-reports rather than objective and behavioural measures. Moreover, the PMPU scale appeared problematic both in terms of the dangerous subscale (which had very low reliability) and the finance subscale (for which no relationships with the predictor variables were found). It is suggested to reconsider the use of these subscales in future research and/or replace them with questions that tap into the use of more sophisticated present-day smartphones (rather than mobile phones as used in the early 2000s), and validate the revised measure. In addition to this, calls per day seemed to have a flooring effect, and this suggested most people tended to use their phones for fewer calls, whilst time on the phone was found to have a ceiling effect, which suggested that people spent more than 30 min on their phones per day on average. The respective questions can be formulated in such a way in future research as to take this into consideration. It is recommended to conduct qualitative research with users to specify the kinds of problems they experience as a result of everyday mobile phone use, which will enrich future research on the topic. Moreover, it is recommended to measure actual mobile phone engagement, using objective behavioural data, possibly using an experience-sampling method (Hofmann et al. 2012 ).

The present findings have implications for prevention and awareness-raising efforts of possibly problematic mobile phone use for educators, parents and individuals themselves, particularly including dependence and prohibited use. Specifically, dedicated interventions are encouraged to foster coping skills in mobile phone users to decrease dysfunctional coping through mobile use. Moreover, similar to the treatment of Internet use-related problems, clinical interventions need to be developed that pay particular attention to the individual’s usage habits and maladaptive coping behaviours, and take into consideration different modes of communication (i.e. synchronous vs asynchronous) as these have shown to differ across age groups. Future research efforts are encouraged to assess mobile phone usage differences across age and gender and how these may impact differently on resultant problems, using longitudinal, experience-sampling and qualitative research.

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Nottingham Trent University (grant number Kickstarter_DK1), the British Academy and the Leverhulme Trust (grant number SG162119) for funding this research.

Authors Contribution

Daria Kuss co-designed and managed the study and wrote the manuscript. Eiman Kanjo co-designed the study. Mark Crook-Rumsey collected, managed and analysed the data. Fraenze Kibowski analysed the data. Grace Wang collected data in New Zealand. Alex Sumich co-designed the study. All authors contributed to and approved the manuscript.

This research was supported by the British Academy and the Leverhulme Trust.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest.

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

• American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5) Arlington: American Psychiatric Association; 2013. [ Google Scholar ]
• Babadi-Akashe Z, Zamani BE, Abedini Y, Akbari H, Hedayati N. The relationship between mental health and addiction to mobile phones among university students of Shahrekord, Iran. Addiction & Health. 2014;6(3–4):93–99. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bedford A, Foulds GA. Delusions symptoms states inventory: state of anxiety and depression (manual) Berkshire: NFER; 1978. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bianchi A, Phillips JG. Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. Cyberpsychology & Behavior. 2005;8(1):39–51. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.39. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Billieux J. Problematic mobile phone use: a literature review and a pathways model. Current Psychiatry Reviews. 2012;8:299–307. doi: 10.2174/157340012803520522. [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Billieux J, Van der Linden M, Rochat L. The role of impulsivity in actual and problematic use of the mobile phone. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2008;22(9):1195–1210. doi: 10.1002/acp.1429. [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Billieux, J., Maurage, P., Lopez-Fernandez, O., Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2015). Can disordered mobile phone use be considered a behavioral addiction? An update on current evidence and a comprehensive model for future research. Current Addiction Reports, 2 (2), 156–162. 10.1007/s40429-015-0054-y
• Boyd D. It’s complicated: the social lives of networked teens. Yale: Yale University Press; 2014. [ Google Scholar ]
• Chóliz M. Mobile phone addiction: a point of issue. Addiction. 2010;105:373–374. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02854.x. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Crawford JR, Henry JD. The depression anxiety stress scales (DASS): normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2003;42(2):111–131. doi: 10.1348/014466503321903544. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Echeburua E, de Corral P. Addiction to new technologies and to online social networking in young people: a new challenge. Adicciones. 2010;22(21):91–95. doi: 10.20882/adicciones.196. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Gafni R, Geri N. Generation Y vs Generation X: differences in smartphone adaptation. In: Eshet-Alkalai Y, Caspi A, Eden S, Geri N, Kalman Y, Yair Y, editors. Proceedings of the Chais Conference on Instructional Technologies Research 2013: learning in the technological era. Raanana: Open University of Israel; 2013. pp. 18–23. [ Google Scholar ]
• Griffiths MD. A “components” model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. Journal of Substance Use. 2005;10:191–197. doi: 10.1080/14659890500114359. [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ha JH, Chin B, Park DH, Ryu SH, Yu J. Characteristics of excessive cellular phone use in Korean adolescents. Cyberpsychology & Behavior. 2008;11(6):783–784. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2008.0096. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Haug S, Castro RP, Kwon M, Filler A, Kowatsch T, Schaub MP. Smartphone use and smartphone addiction among young people in Switzerland. Journal of Behavioral Addictions. 2015;4(4):299–307. doi: 10.1556/2006.4.2015.037. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hofmann W, Vohs KD, Baumeister RF. What people desire, feel conflicted about, and try to resist in everyday life. Psychological Science. 2012;23(6):582–588. doi: 10.1177/0956797612437426. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hong F-Y, Chiu S-I, Huang D-H. A model of the relationship between psychological characteristics, mobile phone addiction and use of mobile phones by Taiwanese university female students. Computers in Human Behavior. 2012;28(6):2152–2159. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.020. [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Jeong S-H, Kim H, Yum J-Y, Hwang Y. What type of content are smartphone users addicted to? SNS vs. games. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016;54:10–17. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.035. [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kanjo, E., Kuss, D. J., and Ang, C. S. (2017). NotiMind: responses to smartphone notifications as affective sensors. IEEE Access , in press.
• Kardefelt-Winther D. A conceptual and methodological critique of internet addiction research: towards a model of compensatory internet use. Computers in Human Behavior. 2014;31:351–354. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.059. [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kuss DJ. Internet gaming addiction: current perspectives. Psychology Research and Behavior Management. 2013;6:125–137. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S39476. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kuss, D. J., Dunn, T. J., Wӧlfling, K., Müller, K. W., Hędzelek, M., & Marcinkowski, J. (2017). Excessive Internet use and psychopathology: the role of coping. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 14 (1), 73-81. 
• Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD. Internet gaming addiction: a systematic review of empirical research. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. 2012;10(2):278–296. doi: 10.1007/s11469-011-9318-5. [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD. Internet addiction in psychotherapy. London: Palgrave; 2015. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kuss, D. J., and Griffiths, M. D. (2017). Social networking sites and addiction: ten lessons learned. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health , in press. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ]
• Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD, Binder JF. Internet addiction in students: prevalence and risk factors. Computers in Human Behavior. 2013;29(3):959–966. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.024. [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kuss, D. J., Griffiths, M. D., & Pontes, H. M. (2016). Chaos and confusion in DSM-5 diagnosis of Internet Gaming Disorder: Issues, concerns, and recommendations for clarity in the field. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7 , 1-7. 10.1556/2006.5.2016.062. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ]
• Kuss DJ, Shorter GW, van Rooij AJ, van de Mheen D, Griffiths MD. The internet addiction components model and personality: establishing construct validity via a nomological network. Computers in Human Behavior. 2014;39:312–321. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.031. [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kuss DJ, van Rooij A, Shorter GW, Griffiths MD, van de Mheen D. Internet addiction in adolescents: prevalence and risk factors. Computers in Human Behavior. 2013;29(5):1987–1996. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.002. [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kwon M, Kim D-J, Cho H, Yang S. The smartphone addiction scale: Development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e83558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083558. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Lopez-Fernandez, O., Kuss, D. J., Romo, L., Morvan, Y., Kern, L., Graziani, P., … Billieux, J. (2017). Use and misuse of mobile technologies in young adulthood: a European cross-cultural empirical study. Journal of Behavioral Addictions , in press. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ]
• Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. 2nd. Sydney: Psychological Foundation; 1995. [ Google Scholar ]
• Motti-Stefanidi F. Identity development in the context of the risk and resilience framework. In: McLean KC, Syed M, editors. The Oxford handbook of identity development. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015. pp. 472–489. [ Google Scholar ]
• Murdock KK. Texting while stressed: Implications for students’ burnout, sleep, and well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture. 2013;24(4):207–221. doi: 10.1037/ppm0000012. [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus user’s guide. Sixth. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén; 2011. [ Google Scholar ]
• Nickerson RC, Isaac H, Mak B. A multi-national study of attitudes about mobile phone use in social settings. International Journal of Mobile Communication. 2008;6(5):541–563. doi: 10.1504/IJMC.2008.019321. [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ofcom. (2016). The UK is now a smartphone society . Retrieved 28.08.2016, from http://media.ofcom.org.uk/news/2015/cmr-uk-2015/
• Panova T, Lleras A. Avoidance or boredom: negative mental health outcomes associated with use of information and communication technologies depend on users’ motivations. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016;58:249–258. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.062. [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Park, N., Hwang, Y., and Huh, E. (2010). Exploring problematic mobile phone use: relationships between adolescents’ characteristics and mobile phone addiction . Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the International Communcation Association, Suntec City, Singapore.
• Przybylski AK, Murayama K, DeHaan CR, Gladwell V. Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior. 2013;29(4):1841–1848. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014. [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Reid DJ, Reid FJ. Text or talk? Social anxiety, loneliness, and divergent preferences for cell phone use. Cyberpsychology & Behavior. 2007;10(3):424–435. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9936. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sitko K, Bentall RP, Shevlin M, O’Sullivan N, Sellwood W. Associations between specific psychotic symptoms and specific childhood adversities are mediated by attachment styles: an analysis of the National Comorbidity Survey. Psychiatry Research. 2014;217(3):202–209. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.03.019. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Turkle S. Alone together. Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Philadelphia: Basic Books; 2013. [ Google Scholar ]
• White MP, Eiser JR, Harris PR. Risk perceptions of mobile phone use while driving. Risk Analysis. 2004;24(2):323–334. doi: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00434.x. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• World Health Organization [WHO]. (2015). Public health implications of excessive use of the internet, computers, smartphones and similar electronic devices . Meeting report, Main Meeting Hall, Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research, National Cancer Research Centre, Tokyo, Japan, 27–29 August 2014. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
• Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 1983;67(6):361–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• View on publisher site
• PDF (482.1 KB)
• Collections

Similar articles

Cited by other articles, links to ncbi databases.

• Download .nbib .nbib
• Format: AMA APA MLA NLM

Add to Collections

Intervention of Internet Addiction and Smartphone Addiction: an Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

• Published: 27 December 2023
• Volume 11 , pages 125–148, ( 2024 )

Cite this article

• Huayu Yang 1   na1 ,
• Haiyun Guo 1   na1 ,
• Zhihui Zhu 1   na1 ,
• Guojing Yuan 1 ,
• Xueqing Zhang 1 ,
• Kexin Zhang 1 ,
• Xiaoyan Lu 1 ,
• Jianghui Zhang 1 ,
• Haiyan Shi 1 ,
• Guifang Jin 1 &
• Zhihua Zhang 1  

1161 Accesses

1 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

Purposeof Review

The prevalence of internet addiction and smartphone addiction has become a widespread global concern. Many studies have evaluated the impact of different interventions on these conditions; however, there is still a lack of integration of higher-level evidence. This review aims to assess the current evidence base of systematic reviews on the impact of different interventions on internet and smartphone addiction.

Recent Findings

A total of 33 systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included in this review. The interventions were categorized into six main categories: psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, sports interventions, internet-based interventions, other types of interventions, and multicomponent interventions. Our analysis revealed that psychotherapy, sports interventions, and multicomponent interventions demonstrated substantial evidence of effectiveness in reducing internet addiction levels. Pharmacotherapy, other types of interventions, and internet-based interventions also showed promising results, but the evidence was inconsistent or limited. However, the evidence on the treatment of smartphone addiction was limited and of lower quality.

The practical value of the identified interventions remains unclear due to the heterogeneity of reported outcomes and the lack of high-quality evidence. Further high-quality randomized clinical trials are needed to determine the optimal interventions for internet and smartphone addiction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Effects of different interventions on internet addiction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Internet Addiction

Associations Between Behavioral Addictions and Mental Health Concerns During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Kovacic Petrovic Z, Peraica T, Kozaric-Kovacic D, Palavra IR. Internet use and internet-based addictive behaviours during coronavirus pandemic. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2022;35:324–31.

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD, Karila L, Billieux J. Internet addiction: a systematic review of epidemiological research for the last decade. Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20:4026–52.

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Griffiths MD, Kuss DJ, Billieux J, Pontes HM. The evolution of Internet addiction: a global perspective. Addict Behav. 2016;53:193–5.

Brand M, Young KS, Laier C, Wölfling K, Potenza MN. Integrating psychological and neurobiological considerations regarding the development and maintenance of specific Internet-use disorders: an Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;71:252–66.

Montag C, Bey K, Sha P, Li M, Chen YF, Liu WY, et al. Is it meaningful to distinguish between generalized and specific Internet addiction? Evidence from a cross-cultural study from Germany, Sweden. Taiwan and China Asia Pac Psychiatry. 2015;7:20–6.

Davis RA. A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use. Comput Hum Behav. 2001;17:187–95.

Article   Google Scholar  

Starcevic V, Aboujaoude E. Internet addiction: reappraisal of an increasingly inadequate concept. CNS Spectr. 2017;22:7–13.

American Psychiatric Association (APA). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th edn. 2013. https://www.psychiatry.org/

World Health Organization (WHO). ICD-11 for mortality and morbidity statistics (ICD-11 MMS). 2019. https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en

Brand M, Rumpf HJ, Demetrovics Z, MÜller A, Stark R, King DL, et al. Which conditions should be considered as disorders in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) designation of “other specified disorders due to addictive behaviors”? J Behav Addict. 2020;11:150–9.

PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Zhang K, Guo H, Wang T, Zhang J, Yuan G, Ren J, et al. A bidirectional association between smartphone addiction and depression among college students: a cross-lagged panel model. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1083856.

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Wu YL, Lin SH, Lin YH. Two-dimensional taxonomy of internet addiction and assessment of smartphone addiction with diagnostic criteria and mobile apps. J Behav Addict. 2021;9:928–33.

James RJE, Dixon G, Dragomir MG, Thirlwell E, Hitcham L. Understanding the construction of ‘behavior’ in smartphone addiction: a scoping review. Addict Behav. 2023;137:107503.

Montag C, Wegmann E, Sariyska R, Demetrovics Z, Brand M. How to overcome taxonomical problems in the study of Internet use disorders and what to do with “smartphone addiction”? J Behav Addict. 2021;9:908–14.

Panova T, Carbonell X. Is smartphone addiction really an addiction? J Behav Addict. 2018;7:252–9.

Baggio S, Starcevic V, Studer J, Simon O, Gainsbury SM, Gmel G, et al. Technology-mediated addictive behaviors constitute a spectrum of related yet distinct conditions: a network perspective. Psychol Addict Behav. 2018;32:564–72.

Billieux J, Maurage P, Lopez-Fernandez O, Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD. Can disordered mobile phone use be considered a behavioral addiction? An update on current evidence and a comprehensive model for future research. Curr Addict Rep. 2015;2:156–62.

Kardefelt-Winther D, Heeren A, Schimmenti A, van Rooij A, Maurage P, Carras M, et al. How can we conceptualize behavioural addiction without pathologizing common behaviours? Addiction. 2017;112:1709–15.

Richardson M, Hussain Z, Griffiths MD. Problematic smartphone use, nature connectedness, and anxiety. J Behav Addict. 2018;7:109–16.

Wong SM, Chen EY, Wong CS, Suen YN, Chan DL, Tsang SH, et al. Impact of smartphone overuse on 1-year severe depressive symptoms and momentary negative affect: longitudinal and experience sampling findings from a representative epidemiological youth sample in Hong Kong. Psychiatry Res. 2022;318:114939.

Zhang G, Yang X, Tu X, Ding N, Lau JTF. Prospective relationships between mobile phone dependence and mental health status among Chinese undergraduate students with college adjustment as a mediator. J Affect Disord. 2020;260:498–505.

Olson JA, Sandra DA, Colucci ÉS, Al Bikaii A, Chmoulevitch D, Nahas J, et al. Smartphone addiction is increasing across the world: a meta-analysis of 24 countries. Comput Hum Behav. 2022;129:107138.

Zhang W, Pu J, He R, Yu M, Xu L, He X, et al. Demographic characteristics, family environment and psychosocial factors affecting internet addiction in Chinese adolescents. J Affect Disord. 2022;315:130–8.

Chung TWH, Sum SMY, Chan MWL. Adolescent internet addiction in Hong Kong: prevalence, psychosocial correlates, and prevention. J Adolesc Health. 2019;64:S34-S43.

Zhong Y, Ma H, Liang YF, Liao CJ, Zhang CC, Jiang WJ. Prevalence of smartphone addiction among Asian medical students: a meta-analysis of multinational observational studies. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2022;68:1171–83.

Mokhtarinia HR, Torkamani MH, Farmani O, Biglarian A, Gabel CP. Smartphone addiction in children: patterns of use and musculoskeletal discomfort during the COVID-19 pandemic in Iran. BMC Pediatr. 2022;22:681.

Lu JX, Zhai YJ, Chen J, Zhang QH, Chen TZ, Lu CL, et al. Network analysis of internet addiction and sleep disturbance symptoms. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2023;125:110737.

Zhang MX, Wu AMS. Effects of smartphone addiction on sleep quality among Chinese university students: the mediating role of self-regulation and bedtime procrastination. Addict Behav. 2020;111:106552.

Argyriou E, Davison CB, Lee TTC. Response inhibition and internet gaming disorder: a meta-analysis. Addict Behav. 2017;71:54–60.

Niu G-f, Shi X-h, Zhang Z-l, Yang W-c, Jin S-y, Sun X-j. Can smartphone presence affect cognitive function? The moderating role of fear of missing out. Comput Hum Behav. 2022;136:107399.

Li Y, Li G, Liu L, Wu H. Correlations between mobile phone addiction and anxiety, depression, impulsivity, and poor sleep quality among college students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Behav Addict. 2020;9:551–71.

Cerniglia L, Zoratto F, Cimino S, Laviola G, Ammaniti M, Adriani W. Internet addiction in adolescence: neurobiological, psychosocial and clinical issues. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017;76:174–84.

Winkler A, Dörsing B, Rief W, Shen Y, Glombiewski JA. Treatment of internet addiction: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2013;33:317–29.

Kwon S, Han SJ, Yeun YR. Effectiveness of smartphone addiction intervention for university students: a systematic review and meta analysis. J Korea Convergence Soc. 2020;11:399–412.

Google Scholar  

Liu X, Jiang J, Zhang Y. Effects of logotherapy-based mindfulness intervention on internet addiction among adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic. Iran J Public Health. 2021;50:789–97.

Zhang W, Xu R. Effect of exercise intervention on internet addiction and autonomic nervous function in college students. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:5935353.

Yang G, Shangguan R, Ke Y, Wang S. The influence of acute aerobic exercise on craving degree for university students with mobile phone dependency: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(15):8983.

Solly JE, Grant JE, Chamberlain SR. Pharmacological interventions for Problematic Usage of the Internet (PUI): a narrative review of current progress and future directions. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2022;46:101158.

Esmaeili Rad M, Ahmadi F. A new method to measure and decrease the online social networking addiction. Asia Pac Psychiatry. 2018;10:e12330.

Lee SJ, Choi MJ, Yu SH, Kim H, Park SJ, Choi IY. Development and evaluation of smartphone usage management system for preventing problematic smartphone use. Digit Health. 2022;8:20552076221089096.

Gorowska M, Tokarska K, Zhou X, Gola MK, Li Y. Novel approaches for treating Internet Gaming Disorder: a review of technology-based interventions. Compr Psychiatry. 2022;115: 152312.

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.

Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358:j4008.

Yeun YR, Han SJ. Effects of psychosocial interventions for school-aged children’s internet addiction, self-control and self-esteem: meta-analysis. Healthc Inform Res. 2016;22:217–30.

Liu J, Nie J, Wang Y. Effects of group counseling programs, cognitive behavioral therapy, and sports intervention on internet addiction in East Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(12):1470.

Chun J, Shim H, Kim S. A Meta-analysis of treatment interventions for internet addiction among Korean adolescents. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2017;20:225–31.

Stevens MWR, King DL, Dorstyn D, Delfabbro PH. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for Internet gaming disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2019;26:191–203.

Malinauskas R, Malinauskiene V. A meta-analysis of psychological interventions for Internet/smartphone addiction among adolescents. J Behav Addict. 2019;8:613–24.

Goslarp M, Leibetseder M, Muench HM, Hofmann SG, Laireiter A-R. Treatments for internet addiction, sex addiction and compulsive buying: a meta-analysis. J Behav Addict. 2020;9:14–43.

Andrade ALM, Di Girolamo Martins G, Scatena A, Lopes FM, de Oliveira WA, Kim HS, et al. The effect of psychosocial interventions for reducing co-occurring symptoms of depression and anxiety in individuals with problematic internet use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022;1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-022-00846-6

Augner C, Vlasak T, Aichhorn W, Barth A. Tackling the ‘digital pandemic’: the effectiveness of psychological intervention strategies in problematic Internet and smartphone use-A meta-analysis. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2022;56:219–29.

Zhang X, Zhang J, Zhang K, Ren J, Lu X, Wang T, Yang H, et al. Effects of different interventions on internet addiction: a meta-analysis of random controlled trials. J Affect Disord. 2022;313:56–71.

Liu H, Soh KG, Samsudin S, Rattanakoses W, Qi F. Effects of exercise and psychological interventions on smartphone addiction among university students: a systematic review. Front Psychol. 2022;13:1021285.

Danielsen PA, Mentzoni RA, Låg T. Treatment effects of therapeutic interventions for gaming disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Addict Behav. 2023;149:107887.

Wang X, Zhang Y, Lin J, Wong ACW, Chan KKY, Wong SYS, et al. Treatments of internet gaming disorder and comorbid mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior (Review). 2023;149:107947.

Zhang K, Lu X, Zhang X, Zhang J, Ren J, Guo H, et al. Effects of psychological or exercise interventions on problematic mobile phone use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Current Addiction Reports (Review). 2023;10:230–53.

Chen Y, Lu J, Wang L, Gao X. Effective interventions for gaming disorder: a systematic review of randomized control trials. Front Psychiatry. 2023;14:1098922.

Ayub S, Jain L, Parnia S, Bachu A, Farhan R, Kumar H, et al. Treatment modalities for internet addiction in children and adolescents: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). J Clin Med. 2023;12(9):3345.

Kuss DJ, Lopez-Fernandez O. Internet addiction and problematic Internet use: a systematic review of clinical research. World J Psychiatry. 2016;6:143–76.

Zajac K, Ginley MK, Chang R, Petry NM. Treatments for Internet gaming disorder and Internet addiction: a systematic review. Psychol Addict Behav. 2017;31:979–94.

Zajac K, Ginley MK, Chang R. Treatments of internet gaming disorder: a systematic review of the evidence. Expert Rev Neurother. 2020;20:85–93.

Xu LX, Wu LL, Geng XM, Wang ZL, Guo XY, Song KR, et al. A review of psychological interventions for internet addiction. Psychiatry Res. 2021;302:114016.

Lampropoulou P, Siomos K, Floros G, Christodoulou N. Effectiveness of available treatments for gaming disorders in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2022;25:5–13.

Pedrero-Pérez EJ, Rojo-Mota G, Huertas-Hoyas E. Systematic review: treatment modalities applied in smartphone addiction/abuse. Health and Addictions / Salud y Drogas (Article). 2022;22:122–31.

Chang CH, Chang YC, Yang L, Tzang RF. The comparative efficacy of treatments for children and young adults with internet addiction/internet gaming disorder: an updated meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:2612.

Lo CKM, Chan KL, Yu L, Chui WWH, Ip P. Long-term effects of psychosocial interventions on internet-related disorders: a meta-analysis. Comput Human Behav (Review). 2023;138:107465.

Sá RRC, Coelho S, Parmar PK, Johnstone S, Kim HS, Tavares H. A Systematic review of pharmacological treatments for internet gaming disorder. Psychiatry Investig. 2023;20:696–706.

Liu S, Xiao T, Yang L, Loprinzi PD. Exercise as an alternative approach for treating smartphone addiction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of random controlled trials. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16:3912.

Zhang Y, Li G, Liu C, Chen H, Guo J, Shi Z. Mixed comparison of interventions for different exercise types on students with Internet addiction: a network meta-analysis. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1111195.

Lam LT, Lam MK. eHealth Intervention for Problematic Internet Use (PIU). Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2016;18:107.

Park JJ, King DL, Wilkinson-Meyers L, Rodda SN. Content and effectiveness of web-based treatments for online behavioral addictions: systematic review. JMIR Ment Health. 2022;9:e36662.

Segawa T, Baudry T, Bourla A, Blanc JV, Peretti CS, Mouchabac S, et al. Virtual reality (VR) in assessment and treatment of addictive disorders: a systematic review. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:1409.

Boumparis N, Haug S, Abend S, Billieux J, Riper H, Schaub MP. Internet-based interventions for behavioral addictions: a systematic review. J Behav Addict. 2022;11:620–42.

Stanković M, Bjekić J, Filipović SR. Effects of transcranial electrical stimulation on gambling and gaming: a systematic review of studies on healthy controls, participants with gambling/gaming disorder, and substance use disorder. J Clin Med. 2023;12(10):3407.

Young KS. Treatment outcomes using CBT-IA with Internet-addicted patients. J Behav Addict. 2013;2:209–15.

Park S. Associations of physical activity with sleep satisfaction, perceived stress, and problematic Internet use in Korean adolescents. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:1143.

Ye S, Cheng H, Zhai Z, Liu H. Relationship between social anxiety and internet addiction in Chinese college students controlling for the effects of physical exercise, demographic, and academic variables. Front Psychol. 2021;12:698748.

Chen H, Dong G, Li K. Overview on brain function enhancement of Internet addicts through exercise intervention: based on reward-execution-decision cycle. Front Psychiatry. 2023;14:1094583.

Hayes SC. Acceptance and commitment therapy: towards a unified model of behavior change. World Psychiatry. 2019;18:226–7.

Groot DF, Morrens M, Dom G. Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) and addiction: a literature review. Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2014;56(9):577–85.

PubMed   Google Scholar  

Download references

Author information

Huayu Yang, Haiyun Guo, and Zhihui Zhu contributed equally and should be considered as co-first authors.

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, China

Huayu Yang, Haiyun Guo, Zhihui Zhu, Guojing Yuan, Xueqing Zhang, Kexin Zhang, Xiaoyan Lu, Jianghui Zhang, Jun Du, Haiyan Shi, Guifang Jin & Zhihua Zhang

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

Huayu Yang designed the study and completed the manuscript. Haiyun Guo, Zhihui Zhu, and Guojing Yuan performed literature searches. Xueqing Zhang, Kexin Zhang, Xiaoyan Lu, Jianghui Zhang, Guifang Jin, Haiyan Shi, and Jun Du contributed to the writing of the manuscript. Zhihua Zhang critically revised the work and completed the final editing of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhihua Zhang .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 16.3 KB)

Supplementary file2 (docx 36 kb), rights and permissions.

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Yang, H., Guo, H., Zhu, Z. et al. Intervention of Internet Addiction and Smartphone Addiction: an Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Curr Addict Rep 11 , 125–148 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-023-00536-w

Download citation

Accepted : 06 December 2023

Published : 27 December 2023

Issue Date : February 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-023-00536-w

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Internet addiction
• Smartphone addiction
• Intervention
• Umbrella review

Advertisement

• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research