Writing a Counselling Case Study
As a counselling student, you may feel daunted when faced with writing your first counselling case study. Most training courses that qualify you as a counsellor or psychotherapist require you to complete case studies.
Before You Start Writing a Case Study
However good your case study, you won’t pass if you don’t meet the criteria set by your awarding body. So before you start writing, always check this, making sure that you have understood what is required.
For example, the ABC Level 4 Diploma in Therapeutic Counselling requires you to write two case studies as part of your external portfolio, to meet the following criteria:
- 4.2 Analyse the application of your own theoretical approach to your work with one client over a minimum of six sessions.
- 4.3 Evaluate the application of your own theoretical approach to your work with this client over a minimum of six sessions.
- 5.1 Analyse the learning gained from a minimum of two supervision sessions in relation to your work with one client.
- 5.2 Evaluate how this learning informed your work with this client over a minimum of two counselling sessions.
If you don’t meet these criteria exactly – for example, if you didn’t choose a client who you’d seen for enough sessions, if you described only one (rather than two) supervision sessions, or if you used the same client for both case studies – then you would get referred.
Check whether any more information is available on what your awarding body is looking for – e.g. ABC publishes regular ‘counselling exam summaries’ on its website; these provide valuable information on where recent students have gone wrong.
Selecting the Client
When you reflect on all the clients you have seen during training, you will no doubt realise that some clients are better suited to specific case studies than others. For example, you might have a client to whom you could easily apply your theoretical approach, and another where you gained real breakthroughs following your learning in supervision. These are good ones to choose.
Opening the Case Study
It’s usual to start your case study with a ‘pen portrait’ of the client – e.g. giving their age, gender and presenting issue. You might also like to describe how they seemed (in terms of both what they said and their body language) as they first entered the counselling room and during contracting.
If your agency uses assessment tools (e.g. CORE-10, WEMWBS, GAD-7, PHQ-9 etc.), you could say what your client scored at the start of therapy.
Free Handout Download
Writing a Case Study: 5 Tips
Describing the Client’s Counselling Journey
This is the part of the case study that varies greatly depending on what is required by the awarding body. Two common types of case study look at application of theory, and application of learning from supervision. Other possible types might examine ethics or self-awareness.
Theory-Based Case Studies
If you were doing the ABC Diploma mentioned above, then 4.1 would require you to break down the key concepts of the theoretical approach and examine each part in detail as it relates to practice. For example, in the case of congruence, you would need to explain why and how you used it with the client, and the result of this.
Meanwhile, 4.2 – the second part of this theory-based case study – would require you to assess the value and effectiveness of all the key concepts as you applied them to the same client, substantiating this with specific reasons. For example, you would continue with how effective and important congruence was in terms of the theoretical approach in practice, supporting this with reasoning.
In both, it would be important to structure the case study chronologically – that is, showing the flow of the counselling through at least six sessions rather than using the key concepts as headings.
Supervision-Based Case Studies
When writing supervision-based case studies (as required by ABC in their criteria 5.1 and 5.2, for example), it can be useful to use David Kolb’s learning cycle, which breaks down learning into four elements: concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualisation and active experimentation.
Rory Lees-Oakes has written a detailed guide on writing supervision case studies – entitled How to Analyse Supervision Case Studies. This is available to members of the Counselling Study Resource (CSR).
Closing Your Case Study
In conclusion, you could explain how the course of sessions ended, giving the client’s closing score (if applicable). You could also reflect on your own learning, and how you might approach things differently in future.
- Bipolar Disorder
- Therapy Center
- When To See a Therapist
- Types of Therapy
- Best Online Therapy
- Best Couples Therapy
- Managing Stress
- Sleep and Dreaming
- Understanding Emotions
- Self-Improvement
- Healthy Relationships
- Student Resources
- Personality Types
- Guided Meditations
- Verywell Mind Insights
- 2024 Verywell Mind 25
- Mental Health in the Classroom
- Editorial Process
- Meet Our Review Board
- Crisis Support
What Is a Case Study?
Weighing the pros and cons of this method of research
Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."
Cara Lustik is a fact-checker and copywriter.
Verywell / Colleen Tighe
- Pros and Cons
What Types of Case Studies Are Out There?
Where do you find data for a case study, how do i write a psychology case study.
A case study is an in-depth study of one person, group, or event. In a case study, nearly every aspect of the subject's life and history is analyzed to seek patterns and causes of behavior. Case studies can be used in many different fields, including psychology, medicine, education, anthropology, political science, and social work.
The point of a case study is to learn as much as possible about an individual or group so that the information can be generalized to many others. Unfortunately, case studies tend to be highly subjective, and it is sometimes difficult to generalize results to a larger population.
While case studies focus on a single individual or group, they follow a format similar to other types of psychology writing. If you are writing a case study, we got you—here are some rules of APA format to reference.
At a Glance
A case study, or an in-depth study of a person, group, or event, can be a useful research tool when used wisely. In many cases, case studies are best used in situations where it would be difficult or impossible for you to conduct an experiment. They are helpful for looking at unique situations and allow researchers to gather a lot of˜ information about a specific individual or group of people. However, it's important to be cautious of any bias we draw from them as they are highly subjective.
What Are the Benefits and Limitations of Case Studies?
A case study can have its strengths and weaknesses. Researchers must consider these pros and cons before deciding if this type of study is appropriate for their needs.
One of the greatest advantages of a case study is that it allows researchers to investigate things that are often difficult or impossible to replicate in a lab. Some other benefits of a case study:
- Allows researchers to capture information on the 'how,' 'what,' and 'why,' of something that's implemented
- Gives researchers the chance to collect information on why one strategy might be chosen over another
- Permits researchers to develop hypotheses that can be explored in experimental research
On the other hand, a case study can have some drawbacks:
- It cannot necessarily be generalized to the larger population
- Cannot demonstrate cause and effect
- It may not be scientifically rigorous
- It can lead to bias
Researchers may choose to perform a case study if they want to explore a unique or recently discovered phenomenon. Through their insights, researchers develop additional ideas and study questions that might be explored in future studies.
It's important to remember that the insights from case studies cannot be used to determine cause-and-effect relationships between variables. However, case studies may be used to develop hypotheses that can then be addressed in experimental research.
Case Study Examples
There have been a number of notable case studies in the history of psychology. Much of Freud's work and theories were developed through individual case studies. Some great examples of case studies in psychology include:
- Anna O : Anna O. was a pseudonym of a woman named Bertha Pappenheim, a patient of a physician named Josef Breuer. While she was never a patient of Freud's, Freud and Breuer discussed her case extensively. The woman was experiencing symptoms of a condition that was then known as hysteria and found that talking about her problems helped relieve her symptoms. Her case played an important part in the development of talk therapy as an approach to mental health treatment.
- Phineas Gage : Phineas Gage was a railroad employee who experienced a terrible accident in which an explosion sent a metal rod through his skull, damaging important portions of his brain. Gage recovered from his accident but was left with serious changes in both personality and behavior.
- Genie : Genie was a young girl subjected to horrific abuse and isolation. The case study of Genie allowed researchers to study whether language learning was possible, even after missing critical periods for language development. Her case also served as an example of how scientific research may interfere with treatment and lead to further abuse of vulnerable individuals.
Such cases demonstrate how case research can be used to study things that researchers could not replicate in experimental settings. In Genie's case, her horrific abuse denied her the opportunity to learn a language at critical points in her development.
This is clearly not something researchers could ethically replicate, but conducting a case study on Genie allowed researchers to study phenomena that are otherwise impossible to reproduce.
There are a few different types of case studies that psychologists and other researchers might use:
- Collective case studies : These involve studying a group of individuals. Researchers might study a group of people in a certain setting or look at an entire community. For example, psychologists might explore how access to resources in a community has affected the collective mental well-being of those who live there.
- Descriptive case studies : These involve starting with a descriptive theory. The subjects are then observed, and the information gathered is compared to the pre-existing theory.
- Explanatory case studies : These are often used to do causal investigations. In other words, researchers are interested in looking at factors that may have caused certain things to occur.
- Exploratory case studies : These are sometimes used as a prelude to further, more in-depth research. This allows researchers to gather more information before developing their research questions and hypotheses .
- Instrumental case studies : These occur when the individual or group allows researchers to understand more than what is initially obvious to observers.
- Intrinsic case studies : This type of case study is when the researcher has a personal interest in the case. Jean Piaget's observations of his own children are good examples of how an intrinsic case study can contribute to the development of a psychological theory.
The three main case study types often used are intrinsic, instrumental, and collective. Intrinsic case studies are useful for learning about unique cases. Instrumental case studies help look at an individual to learn more about a broader issue. A collective case study can be useful for looking at several cases simultaneously.
The type of case study that psychology researchers use depends on the unique characteristics of the situation and the case itself.
There are a number of different sources and methods that researchers can use to gather information about an individual or group. Six major sources that have been identified by researchers are:
- Archival records : Census records, survey records, and name lists are examples of archival records.
- Direct observation : This strategy involves observing the subject, often in a natural setting . While an individual observer is sometimes used, it is more common to utilize a group of observers.
- Documents : Letters, newspaper articles, administrative records, etc., are the types of documents often used as sources.
- Interviews : Interviews are one of the most important methods for gathering information in case studies. An interview can involve structured survey questions or more open-ended questions.
- Participant observation : When the researcher serves as a participant in events and observes the actions and outcomes, it is called participant observation.
- Physical artifacts : Tools, objects, instruments, and other artifacts are often observed during a direct observation of the subject.
If you have been directed to write a case study for a psychology course, be sure to check with your instructor for any specific guidelines you need to follow. If you are writing your case study for a professional publication, check with the publisher for their specific guidelines for submitting a case study.
Here is a general outline of what should be included in a case study.
Section 1: A Case History
This section will have the following structure and content:
Background information : The first section of your paper will present your client's background. Include factors such as age, gender, work, health status, family mental health history, family and social relationships, drug and alcohol history, life difficulties, goals, and coping skills and weaknesses.
Description of the presenting problem : In the next section of your case study, you will describe the problem or symptoms that the client presented with.
Describe any physical, emotional, or sensory symptoms reported by the client. Thoughts, feelings, and perceptions related to the symptoms should also be noted. Any screening or diagnostic assessments that are used should also be described in detail and all scores reported.
Your diagnosis : Provide your diagnosis and give the appropriate Diagnostic and Statistical Manual code. Explain how you reached your diagnosis, how the client's symptoms fit the diagnostic criteria for the disorder(s), or any possible difficulties in reaching a diagnosis.
Section 2: Treatment Plan
This portion of the paper will address the chosen treatment for the condition. This might also include the theoretical basis for the chosen treatment or any other evidence that might exist to support why this approach was chosen.
- Cognitive behavioral approach : Explain how a cognitive behavioral therapist would approach treatment. Offer background information on cognitive behavioral therapy and describe the treatment sessions, client response, and outcome of this type of treatment. Make note of any difficulties or successes encountered by your client during treatment.
- Humanistic approach : Describe a humanistic approach that could be used to treat your client, such as client-centered therapy . Provide information on the type of treatment you chose, the client's reaction to the treatment, and the end result of this approach. Explain why the treatment was successful or unsuccessful.
- Psychoanalytic approach : Describe how a psychoanalytic therapist would view the client's problem. Provide some background on the psychoanalytic approach and cite relevant references. Explain how psychoanalytic therapy would be used to treat the client, how the client would respond to therapy, and the effectiveness of this treatment approach.
- Pharmacological approach : If treatment primarily involves the use of medications, explain which medications were used and why. Provide background on the effectiveness of these medications and how monotherapy may compare with an approach that combines medications with therapy or other treatments.
This section of a case study should also include information about the treatment goals, process, and outcomes.
When you are writing a case study, you should also include a section where you discuss the case study itself, including the strengths and limitiations of the study. You should note how the findings of your case study might support previous research.
In your discussion section, you should also describe some of the implications of your case study. What ideas or findings might require further exploration? How might researchers go about exploring some of these questions in additional studies?
Need More Tips?
Here are a few additional pointers to keep in mind when formatting your case study:
- Never refer to the subject of your case study as "the client." Instead, use their name or a pseudonym.
- Read examples of case studies to gain an idea about the style and format.
- Remember to use APA format when citing references .
Crowe S, Cresswell K, Robertson A, Huby G, Avery A, Sheikh A. The case study approach . BMC Med Res Methodol . 2011;11:100.
Crowe S, Cresswell K, Robertson A, Huby G, Avery A, Sheikh A. The case study approach . BMC Med Res Methodol . 2011 Jun 27;11:100. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-100
Gagnon, Yves-Chantal. The Case Study as Research Method: A Practical Handbook . Canada, Chicago Review Press Incorporated DBA Independent Pub Group, 2010.
Yin, Robert K. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods . United States, SAGE Publications, 2017.
By Kendra Cherry, MSEd Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."
About Features Online Exclusives From the President Career Consultation Knowledge Share Explore
Case conceptualization: Key to highly effective counseling
By Jon Sperry and Len Sperry
December 2020
I n their first session, the counseling intern learned that Jane’s son had been diagnosed with brain cancer. The therapist then elicited the client’s thoughts and feelings about her son’s diagnosis. Jane expressed feelings of guilt and the thought that if she had done more about the early symptoms, this never would have happened to her son. Hearing this guilt producing thought, the intern spent much of the remaining session disputing it. As the session ended, the client was more despondent.
After processing this session in supervision, the intern was no longer surprised that Jane had not kept a follow-up appointment. The initial session had occurred near the end of the intern’s second week, and she had been eager to practice cognitive disputation, which she believed was appropriate in this case. In answer to the supervisor’s question of why she had concluded this, the intern responded that “it felt right.”
The supervisor was not surprised by this response because the intern had not developed a case conceptualization. With one, the intern could have anticipated the importance of immediately establishing an effective and collaborative therapeutic alliance and gently processing Jane’s emotional distress sufficiently before dealing with her guilt-producing thought.
This failure to develop an adequate and appropriate case conceptualization is not just a shortcoming of trainees, however. It is also common enough among experienced counselors.
What is case conceptualization?
Basically, a case conceptualization is a process and cognitive map for understanding and explaining a client’s presenting issues and for guiding the counseling process. Case conceptualizations provide counselors with a coherent plan for focusing treatment interventions, including the therapeutic alliance, to increase the likelihood of achieving treatment goals.
We will use the definition from our integrated case conceptualization model to operationalize the term for the purposes of explaining how to utilize this process. Case conceptualization is a method and clinical strategy for obtaining and organizing information about a client, understanding and explaining the client’s situation and maladaptive patterns, guiding and focusing treatment, anticipating challenges and roadblocks, and preparing for successful termination.
We believe that case conceptualization is the most important counseling competency besides developing a strong therapeutic alliance. If our belief is correct, why is this competency taught so infrequently in graduate training programs, and why do counselors-in-training struggle to develop this skill? We think that case conceptualization can be taught in graduate training programs and that counselors in the field can develop this competency through ongoing training and deliberate practice.
This article will articulate one method for practicing case conceptualization.
The eight P’s
We use and teach the eight P’s format of case conceptualization because it is brief, quick to learn and easy to use. Students and counselors in the community who have taken our workshops say that the step-by-step format helps guide them in forming a mental picture — a cognitive map — of the client. They say that it also aids them in making decisions about treatment and writing an initial evaluation report.
The format is based on eight elements for articulating and explaining the nature and origins of the client’s presentation and subsequent treatment. These elements are described in terms of eight P’s: presentation, predisposition (including culture), precipitants, protective factors and strengths, pattern, perpetuants, (treatment) plan, and prognosis.
Presentation
Presentation refers to a description of the nature and severity of the client’s clinical presentation. Typically, this includes symptoms, personal concerns and interpersonal conflicts.
Four of the P’s — predisposition, precipitants, pattern and perpetuants — provide a clinically useful explanation for the client’s presenting concern.
Predisposition
Predisposition refers to all factors that render an individual vulnerable to a clinical condition. Predisposing factors usually involve biological, psychological, social and cultural factors.
This statement is influenced by the counselor’s theoretical orientation. The theoretical model espouses a system for understanding the cause of suffering, the development of personality traits, and a process for how change and healing can occur in counseling. We will use a biopsychosocial model in this article because it is the most common model used by mental health providers. The model incorporates a holistic understanding of the client.
Biological: Biological factors include genetic, familial, temperament and medical factors, such as family history of a mental or substance disorder, or a cardiovascular condition such as hypertension.
Psychological: Psychological factors might include dysfunctional beliefs involving inadequacy, perfectionism or overdependence, which further predispose the individual to a medical condition such as coronary artery disease. Psychological factors might also involve limited or exaggerated social skills such as a lack of friendship skills, unassertiveness or overaggressiveness.
Social: Social factors could include early childhood losses, inconsistent parenting style, an overly enmeshed or disengaged family environment, and family values such as competitiveness or criticalness. Financial stressors can further exacerbate a client’s clinical presentations. The “social” element in the biopsychosocial model includes cultural factors. We separate these factors out, however.
Cultural: Of the many cultural factors, three are particularly important in developing effective case conceptualizations: level of acculturation, acculturative stress and acculturation-specific stress. Acculturation is the process of adapting to a culture different from one’s initial culture. Adapting to another culture tends to be stressful, and this is called acculturative stress. Such adaptation is reflected in levels of acculturation that range from low to high.
Generally, clients with a lower level of acculturation experience more distress than those with a higher level of acculturation. Disparity in acculturation levels within a family is noted in conflicts over expectations for language usage, career plans, and adherence to the family’s food choices and rituals. Acculturative stress differs from acculturation-specific stresses such as discrimination, second-language competence and microaggressions.
Precipitants
Precipitants refer to physical, psychological and social stressors that may be causative or coincide with the onset of symptoms or relational conflict. These may include physical stressors such as trauma, pain, medication side effects or withdrawal from an addictive substance. Common psychological stressors involve losses, rejections or disappointments that undermine a sense of personal competence. Social stressors may involve losses or rejections that undermine an individual’s social support and status. Included are the illness, death or hospitalization of a significant other, job demotion, the loss of Social Security disability payments and so on.
Protective factors and strengths
Protective factors are factors that decrease the likelihood of developing a clinical condition. Examples include coping skills, a positive support system, a secure attachment style and the experience of leaving an abusive relationship. It is useful to think of protective factors as being the mirror opposite of risk factors (i.e., factors that increase the likelihood of developing a clinical condition). Some examples of risk factors are early trauma, self-defeating beliefs, abusive relationships, self-harm and suicidal ideation.
Related to protective factors are strengths. These are psychological processes that consistently enable individuals to think and act in ways that benefit themselves and others. Examples of strengths include mindfulness, self-control, resilience and self-confidence. Because professional counseling emphasizes strengths and protective factors, counselors should feel supported in identifying and incorporating these elements in their case conceptualizations.
Pattern (maladaptive)
Pattern refers to the predictable and consistent style or manner in which an individual thinks, feels, acts, copes, and defends the self both in stressful and nonstressful circumstances. It reflects the individual’s baseline functioning. Pattern has physical (e.g., a sedentary and coronary-prone lifestyle), psychological (e.g., dependent personality style or disorder) and social features (e.g., collusion in a relative’s marital problems). Pattern also includes the individual’s functional strengths, which counterbalance dysfunction.
Perpetuants
Perpetuants refer to processes through which an individual’s pattern is reinforced and confirmed by both the individual and the individual’s environment. These processes may be physical, such as impaired immunity or habituation to an addictive substance; psychological, such as losing hope or fearing the consequences of getting well; or social, such as colluding family members or agencies that foster constrained dysfunctional behavior rather than recovery and growth. Sometimes precipitating factors continue and become perpetuants.
Plan (treatment)
Plan refers to a planned treatment intervention, including treatment goals, strategy and methods. It includes clinical decision-making considerations and ethical considerations.
Prognosis refers to the individual’s expected response to treatment. This forecast is based on the mix of risk factors and protective factors, client strengths and readiness for change, and the counselor’s experience and expertise in effecting therapeutic change.
Case example
To illustrate this process, we will provide a case vignette to help you practice and then apply the case to our eight P’s format. Ready? Let’s give it a shot.
Joyce is a 35-year-old Ph.D. student at an online university. She is white, identifies as heterosexual and reports that she has never been in a love relationship. She is self-referred and is seeking counseling to reduce her chronic anxiety and social anxiety. She recently started a new job at a bookstore — a stressor that brought her to counseling. She reports feeling very anxious when speaking in her online classes and in social settings. She is worried that she will not be able to manage her anxiety at her new job because she will be in a managerial role.
Joyce reports that she has been highly anxious since childhood. She denies past psychological or psychiatric treatment of any kind but reports that she has recently read several self-help books on anxiety. She also manages her stress by spending time with her close friend from class, spending time with her two dogs, drawing and painting. She appears to be highly motivated for counseling and states that her goals for therapy are “to manage and reduce my anxiety, increase my confidence and eventually get in a romantic relationship.”
Joyce describes her childhood as lonely and herself as “an introvert seeking to be an extrovert.” She states that her parents were successful lawyers who valued success, achievement and public recognition. They were highly critical of Joyce when she would struggle with academics or act shy in social situations. As an only child, she often played alone and would spend her free time reading or drawing by herself.
When asked how she views herself and others, Joyce says, “I often don’t feel like I’m good enough and don’t belong. I usually expect people to be self-centered, critical and judgmental.”
Case conceptualization outline
We suggest developing a case conceptualization with an outline of key phrases for each of the eight P’s. Here is what these phrases might look like for Joyce’s case. These phrases are then woven together into sentences that make up a case conceptualization statement that can be imported into your initial evaluation report.
Presentation: Generalized anxiety symptoms and social anxiety
Precipitant: New job and concerns about managing her anxiety
Pattern (maladaptive): Avoids cl oseness to avoid perceived harm
Predisposition:
- Biological: Paternal history of anxiety
- Psychological: Views herself as inadequate and others as critical; deficits in assertiveness skills, self-soothing skills and relational skills
- Social: Few friends, a history of social anxiety, and parents who were highly successful and critical
- Cultural: No acculturative stress or cultural stressors but from upper-middle-class socioeconomic status, so from privileged background — access to services and resources
Perpetuants: Small support system; believes that she is not competent at work
Protective factors/strengths: Compassionate, creative coping, determined, hardworking, has access to various resources, motivated for counseling
Plan (treatment): Supportive and strengths-based counseling, thought testing, self-monitoring, mindfulness practice, downward arrow technique, coping and relationship skills training, referral for group counseling
Prognosis: Good, given her motivation for treatment and the extent to which her strengths and protective factors are integrated into treatment
Case conceptualization statement
Joyce presents with generalized anxiety symptoms and social anxiety (presentation) . A recent triggering event includes her new job at a local bookstore — she is concerned that she will make errors and will have high levels of anxiety (precipitant) . She presents with an avoidant personality — or attachment — style and typically avoids close relationships. She has one close friend and has never been in a love relationship. She typically moves away from others to avoid being criticized, judged or rejected (pattern) . Some perpetuating factors include her small support system and her belief that she is not competent at work (perpetuants) .
Some of her protective factors and strengths include that she is compassionate, uses art and music to cope with stress, is determined and hardworking, and is collaborative in the therapeutic relationship. Protective factors include that she has a close friend from school, has access to university services such as counseling services and student clubs and organizations, is motivated to engage in counseling, and has health insurance (strengths & protective factors) .
The following biopsychosocial factors attempt to explain Joyce’s anxiety symptoms and avoidant personality style: a paternal history of anxiety (biological) ; she views herself as inadequate and others as critical and judgmental, and she struggles with deficits in assertiveness skills, self-soothing skills and relational skills (psychological) ; she has few friends, a history of social anxiety and parents who were highly successful and critical toward her (social) . Given Joyce’s upper-middle-class upbringing, she was born into a life of opportunity and privilege, so her entitlement of life going in a preferred and comfortable path may also explain her challenges with managing life stress (cultural) .
Besides facilitating a highly supportive, empathic and encouraging counseling relationship, treatment will include psychoeducation skills training to develop assertiveness skills, self-soothing skills and relational skills. These skills will be implemented through modeling, in-session rehearsal and role-play. Her challenges with relationship skills and interpersonal patterns will also be addressed with a referral to a therapy group at the university counseling center. Joyce’s negative self-talk, interpersonal avoidance and anxiety symptoms will be addressed with Socratic questioning, thought testing, self-monitoring, mindfulness practice and the downward arrow technique (plan-treatment) .
The outcome of therapy with Joyce is judged to be good, given her motivation for treatment, if her strengths and protective factors are integrated into the treatment process (prognosis) .
Notice how the treatment plan is targeted at the presenting symptoms and pattern dynamics of Joyce’s case. Each of the eight P’s was identified in the case conceptualization, and you can see the flow of each element and its interconnections to the other elements.
Tips for writing effective case conceptualizations
1) Seek consultation or supervision with a peer or supervisor for feedback on your case conceptualizations. Often, another perspective will help you understand the various elements (eight P’s) that you are trying to conceptualize.
2) Be flexible with your hypotheses and therapeutic guesses when piecing together case conceptualizations. Sometimes your hunches will be accurate, and sometimes you will be way off the mark.
3) Consider asking the client how they would explain their presenting problem. We begin with a question such as, “How might you explain the (symptoms, conflict, etc.) you are experiencing?” The client’s perspective may reveal important predisposing factors and cultural influences as well as their expectations for treatment.
4) Be OK with being imperfect or being completely wrong. This process takes practice, feedback and supervision.
5) After each initial intake or assessment, jot down the presenting dynamics and make some guesses of the cause or etiology of them.
6) Have a solid understanding of at least one theoretical model. Read some of the seminal textbooks or watch counseling theory videos to help you gain a comprehensive assessment of a specific theory. Knowing the foundational ideas of at least one theory will help with your conceptual map of piecing together the information that you’ve gathered about a client.
We realize that putting together case conceptualizations can be a challenge, particularly in the beginning. We hope you will find that this approach works for you. Best wishes!
For more information and ways of learning and using this approach to case conceptualization, check out the recently published second edition of our book, Case Conceptualization: Mastering This Competency With Ease and Confidence .
Jon Sperry is an associate professor of clinical mental health counseling at Lynn University in Florida. He teaches, writes about and researches case conceptualization and conducts workshops on it worldwide. Contact him at [email protected] or visit his website at drjonsperry.com .
Len Sperry is a professor of counselor education at Florida Atlantic University and a fellow of the American Counseling Association. He has long advocated for counselors learning and using case conceptualization, and his research team has completed eight studies on it. Contact him at [email protected] .
Knowledge Share articles are developed from sessions presented at American Counseling Association conferences.
- Assessment, Diagnosis & Treatment
- Treatment & Intervention
Search CT Articles
Current Issue
VIEW ISSUE ARCHIVE
Sign Up for Updates
2461 Eisenhower Avenue, Suite 300, Alexandria, Va. 22314 | 800-347-6647 | (fax) 800-473-2329
My ACA Join Now Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use © All Rights Reserved.
- How we work
- Testimonials
- Why we're different
- Academic writing fees
- Business writing fees
- Web writing fees
- Marketing essay writing
- Psychotherapy essays
- Psychology research papers
- Term paper writing
- Web writing
- Business Writing
- Proofreading
You're on the page of custom research paper writing service
Popular posts.
- Academic Writing 138
- Business Writing 5
- Essay Writing Service 15
- Research paper 27
- Web Writing 1
How to write counseling case studies
- Jan 31, 2021
- Essay Writing Service
As a psychotherapy or counseling student, you are very likely to come across such written assignments as counseling case studies . As this is a very particular type of academic assignment, we created this guide to help you write psychotherapy case studies as a professional.
A counseling case study is basically a simulation of your future work as a counselor. You have got a case about a person who has some psychological or mental challenges. You are provided with a description of the situation, the client’s complaints, behavior, some environmental factors like family, work, ethnic, cultural, and socio-economic factors, and you need to present your opinion about the situation and a tentative treatment plan.
So essentially, you need to imagine yourself as a psychotherapist who works with this client and knows how to treat him. Therefore in your paper, you cannot just write irrelevant information such as definitions of mental diseases, history of counseling, or other side digressions just to fill up the required word count. This approach may work for many types of essays, but not for counseling case studies. When writing case studies on psychotherapy, you need to be very on point.
Your paper should contain three basic sections:
- Your analysis about the client’s situation;
- Diagnosis or summary/interpretation of the client’s problem from a particular theoretical standpoint or from an integrative perspective
- Interventions that might help the client based on your analysis.
Your counseling case study should contain the analysis of the client's situation, assessment or diagnosis, and treatment plan containing proposed interventions and reflection on the therapeutic process.
Keep in mind that the basic principle of academic paper writing is: KNOW WHAT YOU WRITE . That means know what you are required to write (make sure you understand the assignment and read the case carefully) and have the background knowledge about the theory and practice of psychotherapy, general counseling theories or a specific theory, and therapeutic techniques and interventions.
For some people, such an assignment may seem overwhelming as you are not a working counselor yet and you are not sure how to tackle the client’s problem. But do not panic, just follow the steps below to produce a high-quality counseling case study.
1. Read your assignment and the case description carefully
Clarify all the terms you encounter in the case. Make sure you know what theory of psychotherapy you are expected to follow in your diagnosis and treatment plan. If no theoretical approach is mentioned in your assignment, check if you have covered any particular theories in your classes.
If you are not sure what a theory of psychotherapy is, it’s a particular approach to interpret psychological and mental problems. The first theory of psychotherapy was psychoanalysis developed by Sigmund Freud. Its theoretical foundation relied on distinguishing three parts of the mind: ego, superego, and id; recognizing the role of the subconscious with its instincts and drives in psychological conflicts; interpreting maladaptive behavior through the lens of ego defenses; recognizing the role of early childhood experiences, particularly childhood traumas, in the pathophysiology of mental problems. Later, many other theories of counseling were developed, such as Adlerian, existential, humanistic and person-centered, behavior (BT), cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT), Gestalt therapy, reality, feminist, narrative, solution-focused brief therapy, family systems therapy , and many others. So if earlier in the class, you covered humanistic counseling, you can use the humanistic theoretical approach in your case analysis (unless, of course, your assignment clearly states what theory you need to follow).
2. Review the textbook chapters on that theory paying attention to particular approaches to diagnosis and therapeutic techniques.
Theory is important as different theoretical frameworks interpret the same situation in a different way. For example, the same symptoms could be interpreted as defenses caused by childhood trauma in psychoanalysis, malfunctioning behavioral patterns in Behavior therapy, dysfunctional cognitive schemes in CBT, unfinished business in Gestalt, destructive environmental factors in feminist therapy, being stuck in a pattern of living a problem-saturated story in narrative therapy, and so on.
3. Re-read the case again paying attention to special terms
and see if you now understand the meaning of these terms after studying the literature.
4. Read additional resources (optional)
If you still have doubts about the case and how to proceed with it, you might need additional resources, either provided by your teacher or found on the Internet. If you have a specific psychotherapeutic theory to follow for your case, you can google “assessment and treatment in [your theory]” and search for books, worksheets, or articles.
5. Summarize the client’s situation in the case.
In this stage, we start writing up the draft of the case analysis. Describe the gist of the client’s problem as he sees it and as you can grasp from the description of his behavior, thoughts, and feelings in the case. If you can locate it in the case, summarize his family situation, relationships, the family of origins, and work relations . Also, note if any sociocultural factors, like race, religion, ethnicity, gender, income level, sexual orientation, or neighborhood , may have impacted the client and his significant relations. Note if the client has previously done efforts to deal with his problems and what these efforts were.
6. Formulate a diagnosis for the client.
This section will often require you to provide a diagnosis according to DSM diagnostic criteria or formulate a problem according to the conventions of your counseling theory. Some theoretical frameworks, like Narrative or Feminist therapy, do not make diagnoses in working with clients as they view clinical diagnosis as a pathologizing, discriminatory and condescending practice that skews power balance in favor of the therapist. So if you are writing the case study within one of these paradigms, you will not have to provide a diagnosis for the client. However, you will still have to make a sort of assessment. While diagnosis involves identifying specific mental disorders based on patterns of symptoms, for assessment , you need to point out the client’s main problem and identify the main factors of the client’s life that you think might be contributing to this problem.
If you need to provide the diagnosis according to DSM-V manual, pay attention to the Differential diagnosis section for each disorder description. If the client’s symptoms initially look like major depressive disorder, you can consult the differential diagnosis section in the major depressive disorder chapter to see if there are alternative explanations fitting the client’s symptoms. Thus, for major depressive disorder, the alternatives may be substance/medication-induced depressive or bipolar disorder, mood disorder due to another medical condition, ADHD, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, and sadness. Check the diagnostic criteria for all these disorders to find which one fits better. Some of the assignments will require you to spell out how many symptoms fit the criteria of the disorders, and name these symptoms.
7. Outline the developmental context of the problem.
Write how the client’s problem developed over time. Consider if early childhood experiences, the family of origin, or family structure may have contributed to this problem. Has a similar problem been experienced by some family member before? Have environmental and socio-economic factors , like income level, race, ethnicity, religion, sex, sexual orientation, or any others, contributed to the development of the problem? How do these developmental factors interact with the current stressors and conflicts to shape the client’s worldview? Does the client have social support or safety net to rely on? In some theoretical approaches, you will also have to identify the client’s pathogenic or irrational beliefs about himself (like BT and CBT), maladaptive styles of functioning (Gestalt, psychoanalysis), or internalized dysfunctional cultural narratives (narrative and feminist therapies).
8. Propose interventions and techniques that might benefit the client.
If you follow a specific theory, this assignment is not that hard. Just go to the textbook chapter of your theory, check the techniques and interventions, and choose the ones that are appropriate for your situation. But do not just mechanically copy the list of techniques from the textbook. Imagine yourself sitting with the client and having a counseling session with them. Where would you start? If you are at loss, remember that almost all theories start with establishing a contact, creating a therapeutic relationship with the client. You might start by explaining your role and responsibilities, the client’s rights and the process of therapy, and getting informed consent from the client. Listen to his story attentively and respectfully, learn reflective listening , suspend judgment about the client, show empathy . These are basic things that almost all therapists irrespective of their theoretical orientation and client’s problem, use. To these, you will add specific techniques from your theoretical approach or techniques that are normally used for similar problems.
9. Add reflections on the therapeutic process.
This section is not required in all case studies, but it’s often present since you need to be aware of this aspect as a future therapist. Here, write what you think about the client. Does she and her problems engage you emotionally? How might your feelings help or hinder the therapeutic process? Is there room for countertransference (when a client’s problem triggers an emotional response from you connected with your previous experience or your own problem). How might this client perceive you? How might her feelings help or hinder the therapeutic process? What challenges you might face while working with the client? What traits of your personality or any previous experience might help you establish trust and connection?
Final thoughts
This is the general outline of all counseling case studies. The requirements might vary from case to case, but these steps are pretty much essential for a solid analysis of a client’s situation in a therapeutic setting. All these steps might seem overwhelming to you, but do not despair. To be successful, it is essential to understand the requirements and the case, have knowledge about your theory and counseling approach, and then use your brains to reflect on the given case using common sense, knowledge from the textbook, and your imagination of how you would work with a person presented in the case. As you see, in this paper there is not much room for paraphrasing or filling the space with irrelevant information. Everything must be very to the point. The only place where you can use some rewriting is the DSM diagnosis section, ONLY if the teacher asks you to note down all the symptoms that fit the diagnosis. Then you can take those symptoms from the diagnostic criteria of the disorder and slightly paraphrase them. The rest of the paper is your own reflection about the case, the client, and the ways to help him . If you feel intimidated, do not worry. Just start doing these cases, and you will get better with time.
If you feel that you need professional help from a research assistant with good experience in counseling case studies, you’re at the right place. Check our prices for custom written counseling case studies and make your order here , it takes just a few minutes.
Our academic writing service guarantees
100% original, unlimited revisions.
Or find out more about our service of counseling research paper writing and psychotherapy essay writing Read our guide on writing research papers on counseling
Our Services
Quality writing, money back guarantee, safe and confidential, great customer support, company info.
Personal Writer is a professional custom research and writing service that has been on the market of academic writing for 11 years
NEWSLETTER SIGNUP
Recent posts.
- a book about research
- abortion paper
- academic assignment
- academic essay
- academic essay formatting
- academic essay writing
- academic ethics
- academic evidence
- academic pressure
- academic report
- academic research
- academic research textbook
- academic service
- academic styles
- academic writing
Our services
Academic Writing Business Writing
Web Writing Editing Proofreading
Research Paper Writing Service
Academic Essay Writing
Term Paper Writing Service
Counseling Research Papers
Psychotherapy Essay Writing
Psychology Research Writing
Philosophy Essays
Our Keywords
online essay writer english essay writer research papers for sale online essay writing buy a research paper online research paper writing service academic writing for graduate students help with essay writing essay writing help research services college research paper writing research papers custom research paper writing term paper good essay writing college application essay writing college essay help
Connect with us
Twitter Facebook Google Linkedin Skype Vimeo
Copyright © 2018 by Personal Writer - All Rights Reserved
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
As a counselling student, you may feel daunted when faced with writing your first case study. Here we offer tips and information to guide you in completing your counselling case studies.
There are, however, emerging criteria on what makes a quality case study. In general, counselling professionals may choose to write a case study for any of four main purposes: for research, publication, or professional development, or as part of a professional assessment process such as an application for BACP Accreditation.
Case conceptualization helps answer key questions. Who is this client? How did they become who they are? What supports do they need to reach their goals? The conceptualization itself depends on gathering all pertinent …
Case conceptualization is a method and clinical strategy for obtaining and organizing information about a client, understanding and explaining the client’s situation and maladaptive patterns, guiding and focusing treatment, anticipating challenges and roadblocks, and preparing for successful termination.
A notable area of application of case study methodology in counselling and psychotherapy has been its use in highlighting issues that have been previously neglected within the professional and research literature.
A counseling case study is basically a simulation of your future work as a counselor. You have got a case about a person who has some psychological or mental challenges.
This book provides the reader with a unique introduction to the conceptual and practical tools required to conduct high quality case study research that is grounded in their own therapy practice or training.
this book are described and illustrated through the case studies. Each case study is unique and distinctive, with each offering a rare opportunity for mental health prac-titioners to get a bird’s-eye view of what happens around the world. Therefore, the study of these cases individually and collectively will yield a wealth of information